Step 1
Welcome and orientation
Start with a calm explanation of what onboarding will and will not do. The goal is progress without pretending everything must be configured at once.
TR-2531 onboarding and launch docs
This first onboarding slice is intentionally a launch-doc and sequence shell, not a fake full wizard. It makes the first-run path clearer now, while keeping AI advisory, migration-aware, and bounded by explicit approval for high-risk actions.
The launch shell should reduce confusion by sequencing good decisions, not by pretending everything can be auto-handled.
Step 1
Start with a calm explanation of what onboarding will and will not do. The goal is progress without pretending everything must be configured at once.
Step 2
Access should be deliberate from the start. Onboarding can explain roles and setup posture, but it should not encourage casual permission expansion just to move faster.
Step 3
Focus first on the small set of foundational setup decisions that make later work easier. Leave advanced configuration for later instead of front-loading everything.
Step 4
Keep the month-to-month posture, two-month trial, hardship visibility, and guided-help option visible before a church builds the wrong expectations.
Step 5
Make import now versus later explicit. Migration help should be honest about staging and review instead of implying one-click perfection.
Step 6
Churches should be able to keep learning without being forced into full migration immediately. If importing, the path should stay staged, reviewable, and explicit.
Step 7
Show a small, high-value setup sequence with clear optional versus required boundaries. Avoid sprawling setup checklists and feature-tour fluff.
Step 8
After onboarding, the church should know what is safe to do now, what should wait, and when to escalate to human help instead of guessing.
Transparent should feel smart by reducing confusion, not by taking consequential decisions out of the church’s hands.
Some actions should be prepared by onboarding, but never casually executed through it.
Onboarding may explain these actions and help a church prepare for them, but the product should show plain-language consequences and require explicit operator approval before commit.
The current public launch shell is English-first. Spanish parity remains an explicit review and implementation task for trust-sensitive surfaces, so no Spanish path should be implied equivalent until it is rechecked and landed.
This keeps the page truthful about what has landed already and what still belongs in later implementation work.
A calm launch-shell sequence that explains the first-run path, advisory AI boundaries, migration-aware choices, and explicit approval classes.
The first documentation set should extend onboarding, not drift away from it.
A calm launch-shell sequence that explains the first-run path, advisory AI boundaries, migration-aware choices, and explicit approval classes.
Open launch doc →A short launch checklist that separates immediate evaluation decisions from actions that should wait for explicit review.
Open launch doc →The onboarding shell should keep support and escalation obvious before a church gets stuck.
Use launch help content when you want the governed explanation first.
Browse help center →Use the assistant when a launch help article may answer the question quickly.
Open support assistant →Use structured intake when the issue is blocked, sensitive, or better handled as a case.
Open structured intake →