Standalone product boundary, not folded into another app
Structured to stay simple, reviewable, and compatible with the launch planning set.
Transparent church management software
Transparent is being built to give churches a modern system without vague commitments, pressure-heavy sales patterns, or confusing migration promises.
This slice keeps the first public shell honest while the deeper product build catches up.
The first public shell stays conservative. It reflects the launch contracts for pricing clarity, tenant separation, support boundaries, and practical AI assistance without claiming unfinished product depth.
Structured to stay simple, reviewable, and compatible with the launch planning set.
Structured to stay simple, reviewable, and compatible with the launch planning set.
Structured to stay simple, reviewable, and compatible with the launch planning set.
Transparent launch pricing is monthly, starts with a two-month free trial, and scales by active people. We are keeping the structure simple so churches can understand what changes, when it changes, and why.
Transparent is being shaped for churches that need a careful move off older systems. Public messaging stays grounded, and guided help remains available when your migration questions are more complex than a self-serve walkthrough can cover.
Churches that want to evaluate quickly should be able to start without waiting on a salesperson.
Complex migration or stakeholder alignment needs should route cleanly into a demo and support path.
Transparent can use AI to help with setup, documentation, and evaluation guidance. It should never pretend to make high-consequence church decisions on its own or silently replace canonical billing, record, or access truth.
Use AI to explain, guide, and surface answers. Do not let it quietly become the truth source for billing, record state, or permissions.
The current public launch shell is English-first. Spanish parity remains an explicit review and implementation task for trust-sensitive surfaces, so no Spanish path should be implied equivalent until it is rechecked and landed.
Address the main objections with calm, bounded answers.
No. This first implementation slice creates the initial public shell and pricing structure. More product surfaces will land in later tranches.
Launch planning is built around a month-to-month posture with a two-month free trial, not hidden annual-lock-in assumptions.
Yes. Requesting a demo is intended to remain a first-class path for churches that want guided evaluation or have more complex migration needs.
The first build tranche focuses on a clean shell, honest pricing language, and clear next steps.
Want the first-run sequence before you start? Review the getting-started guide →